Re: [RFC/largely untested/PATCH] sha1_name: interpret ~n as HEAD~n
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 1, 2011, 18:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vfwoys20u.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1304238652.9638.1446946253@webmail.messagingengine.com>
"Michael J Gruber" <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
> I meant "rebase -i", sorry. And in fact I mostly mean those cases where > I want to "amend" a commit which is not the top most one.
I also see myself getting tempted to say "rebase -i -2" every once in a while; it seems to go well with "log -2" especially when the history is linear.