Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 5, 2011, 11:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTinaoopUxOHC0XaUxMLXj4pCXND+UA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v62ppdhh5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Heya,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 04:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> - I am not sure if git-submodule.sh correctly works with the "as long as > there is a working tree somewhere, it is OK" semantics. It may have > to stay "require_work_tree" to ensure that the $cwd is within the > working tree.
So do we need more tests for git-submodule to find out, or is this a hint to the submodule people to chime in? If so, should they be cc-ed?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier