Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 4, 2011, 21:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110504212848.GA27779@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vliymfp4t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:42:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > ... but I worry about compatibility. We can audit our in-tree scripts, > > but git-sh-setup is part of the recommended API for external scripts, > > no? > > I am Ok with renaming the thing to "require_work_tree_exists", and all the > worry will go away.
Yeah, that seems like a fine solution to me.
-Peff