From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:15:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says
Message-ID: <BANLkTinaoopUxOHC0XaUxMLXj4pCXND+UA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v62ppdhh5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Heya,

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 04:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>  - I am not sure if git-submodule.sh correctly works with the "as long as
>   there is a working tree somewhere, it is OK" semantics.  It may have
>   to stay "require_work_tree" to ensure that the $cwd is within the
>   working tree.

So do we need more tests for git-submodule to find out, or is this a
hint to the submodule people to chime in? If so, should they be cc-ed?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier