Re: non-empty index with git commit -a
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2011, 08:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTinbcHW+ja7T=PiCEorNdnK6W2DvA_c9F8JTEMKB@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110216032047.GA2858@elie>
Heya,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 03:20, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I remember the discussion[1] correctly, by requiring a separate > add -u step (or commit -f -a) if the "I don't trust my fingers" > configuration is enabled.
That would definitely work for me. The question then is, should git consider the index precious by default, or not? That is, should that value default to true in 1.8?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier