Re: non-empty index with git commit -a
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2011, 10:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqbp2cmfy6.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110216095415.GA12578@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> So? Your question was whether index state is precious. If it's precious, > shouldn't we be keeping a history of it?
If it's really precious, it probably means you should be commit --amend instead. You'd get the reflog, and essentially the same functionalities.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/