From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:18:18 GMT Subject: Re: non-empty index with git commit -a Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20110216032047.GA2858@elie> Heya, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 03:20, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > If I remember the discussion[1] correctly, by requiring a separate > add -u step (or commit -f -a) if the "I don't trust my fingers" > configuration is enabled. That would definitely work for me. The question then is, should git consider the index precious by default, or not? That is, should that value default to true in 1.8? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier