Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2011, 11:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTim8m4uBjn_FJ-SWnARkv8rTiM1SrBTBFeg2R_hd@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1297850903-65038-2-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> When a cherry-pick conflicts git advises to use: > > $ git commit -c <original commit id> > > to preserve the original commit message and authorship. Instead, let's > record the original commit id in CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and advise to use: > > $ git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
Wouldn't it be more convenient to do "git cherry-pick --continue" instead of "git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD"?
-- Duy