From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:13:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
Message-ID: <AANLkTim8m4uBjn_FJ-SWnARkv8rTiM1SrBTBFeg2R_hd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1297850903-65038-2-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> wrote:
> When a cherry-pick conflicts git advises to use:
>
>  $ git commit -c <original commit id>
>
> to preserve the original commit message and authorship. Instead, let's
> record the original commit id in CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and advise to use:
>
>  $ git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD

Wouldn't it be more convenient to do "git cherry-pick --continue"
instead of "git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD"?
-- 
Duy