Re: [PATCH 2/2] Teach commit about CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2011, 22:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110216224349.GE2615@elie>
- In-Reply-To
- <1297850903-65038-3-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Jay Soffian wrote:
> This change fixes that situation. A bare 'commit' will now take the > authorship from CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and the commit message from MERGE_MSG. > If the user wishes to reset authorship, that must now be done explicitly > via --reset-author.
Might also be worth mentioning that it makes --amend fail in such a situation (a change worth celebrating).
Show 11 quoted lines
> --- a/builtin/commit.c > +++ b/builtin/commit.c > @@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ static const char empty_amend_advice[] = > > static unsigned char head_sha1[20]; > > -static char *use_message_buffer; > +static const char *use_message_buffer; > static const char commit_editmsg[] = "COMMIT_EDITMSG"; > +static const char cherry_pick_head[] = "CHERRY_PICK_HEAD"; > +static const char merge_head[] = "MERGE_HEAD";
Hmm, these variables but not MERGE_MSG, MERGE_MODE, and SQUASH_MSG?
Show 5 quoted lines
> @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static enum {
>
> static const char *logfile, *force_author;
> static const char *template_file;
> +static const char *author_message, *author_message_buffer;That's not a message at all, is it? On first reading I thought it would be a message about the author. Maybe a comment can help.
/* name and content of commit from which to copy authorship */
Show 7 quoted lines
> @@ -88,7 +91,8 @@ static enum {
> } cleanup_mode;
> static char *cleanup_arg;
>
> -static int use_editor = 1, initial_commit, in_merge, include_status = 1;
> +static enum commit_whence whence;
> +static int use_editor = 1, initial_commit, include_status = 1;The name "whence" is not so self-explanatory but I don't have any better ideas (I probably would have written "merge_or_cherry_pick"; we can be glad you came up with something better).
Show 8 quoted lines
> @@ -163,6 +167,36 @@ static struct option builtin_commit_options[] = {
> OPT_END()
> };
>
> +static void determine_whence(struct wt_status *s)
> +{
> + if (file_exists(git_path(merge_head)))
> + whence = FROM_MERGE;Micronit: maybe COMMITTING_A_MERGE or COMMIT_DURING_MERGE to avoid using valuable namespace?
Show 7 quoted lines
> @@ -644,7 +678,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix, > * This final case does not modify the template message, > * it just sets the argument to the prepare-commit-msg hook. > */ > - else if (in_merge) > + else if (whence == FROM_MERGE) > hook_arg1 = "merge";
Perhaps:
else if (whence == CHERRY_PICK) {
hook_arg1 = "commit";
hook_arg2 = author_message;
}> @@ -694,16 +728,18 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
[...]
Show 8 quoted lines
> "# If this is not correct, please remove the file\n" > "# %s\n" > "# and try again.\n" > "#\n", > + whence_s(), > + git_path(whence == FROM_MERGE > + ? merge_head > + : cherry_pick_head));
Ok. We probably should move away from having to suggest "rm -f .git/whatever" in the future (maybe
git update-ref -d %s
is simpler advice? I dunno).
Show 5 quoted lines
> @@ -898,6 +934,27 @@ static void handle_untracked_files_arg(struct wt_status *s)
> die("Invalid untracked files mode '%s'", untracked_files_arg);
> }
>
> +static const char *read_commit_message(const char *name) {Nice. Opening '{' should be in the first column.> +++ b/builtin/revert.c
[...]
Show 8 quoted lines
> @@ -284,9 +233,7 @@ static void print_advice(void)
>
> advise("after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths");
> advise("with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'");
> -
> - if (action == CHERRY_PICK)
> - advise("and commit the result with 'git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD'");
> + advise("and commit the result with 'git commit'");Hoorah!
Show 11 quoted lines
> --- a/wt-status.c > +++ b/wt-status.c > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_unmerged_header(struct wt_status *s) > color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# Unmerged paths:"); > if (!advice_status_hints) > return; > - if (s->in_merge) > + if (s->whence != FROM_COMMIT) > ; > else if (!s->is_initial) > color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# (use \"git reset %s <file>...\" to unstage)", s->reference);
Isn't the advice of using "git reset -- <paths>" still good in the CHERRY_PICK case?
Show 7 quoted lines
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_cached_header(struct wt_status *s) > color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# Changes to be committed:"); > if (!advice_status_hints) > return; > - if (s->in_merge) > + if (s->whence != FROM_COMMIT) > ; /* NEEDSWORK: use "git reset --unresolve"??? */
Likewise here.
Show 11 quoted lines
> --- a/wt-status.h
> +++ b/wt-status.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ enum untracked_status_type {
> SHOW_ALL_UNTRACKED_FILES
> };
>
> +enum commit_whence {
> + FROM_COMMIT,
> + FROM_MERGE,
> + FROM_CHERRY_PICK
> +};Style: please use tabs to indent.
Show 6 quoted lines
> @@ -40,7 +46,7 @@ struct wt_status {
> const char **pathspec;
> int verbose;
> int amend;
> - int in_merge;
> + enum commit_whence whence;Might benefit from a comment.
/* whether a merge or cherry-pick is in progress */ enum commit_whence whence;
Thanks, very readable.