Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add -p: select individual hunk lines

From: Igor Djordjevic <igor.d.djordjevic@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 6, 2018, 21:20 UTC
Message-ID: <9e46f6c7-952f-c4d3-6a12-40c59baaa702@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr2ow3ojb.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

Hi Junio,

On 06/03/2018 22:03, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> 
> > A small nitpick - I see you use phrasing like "select lines", where 
> > the other commands usually talk about "staging", instead, so "stage 
> > lines" might be more aligned with the existing text.
> 
> Isn't this machinery shared across "add -p" and "reset -p"?  What is
> done to the selected lines when you are using this UI while running
> "reset -p"?  I hope it is not "staging".  If the interface only
> "selects lines" and what is done to the selected lines depends on
> what operation is using this backend, then the current phrasing is
> perfectly fine and saying "staging" makes it actively worse.

Hmm, if that is the case, I agree, but I was merely trying to review the files being changed - for example, inside "Documentation/git-add.txt":

       y - stage this hunk
       n - do not stage this hunk
       q - quit; do not stage this hunk or any of the remaining ones
       a - stage this hunk and all later hunks in the file
       d - do not stage this hunk or any of the later hunks in the file
       g - select a hunk to go to
       / - search for a hunk matching the given regex
       j - leave this hunk undecided, see next undecided hunk
       J - leave this hunk undecided, see next hunk
       k - leave this hunk undecided, see previous undecided hunk
       K - leave this hunk undecided, see previous hunk
       s - split the current hunk into smaller hunks
       e - manually edit the current hunk
       ? - print help

In there, adding "l" should follow "stage" phrasing, I would think.

But you are right for "git-add--interactive.perl", for example - in there, I didn`t notice the line (seems to be?) added inside the shared "help_patch_cmd".

But if so, I guess it should then be moved to more context-related "help_patch_modes", being phrased accordingly in there.

Thanks for pointing this out, let me recheck my comments.

Regards, Buga