Re: [BUG] t9101 (master) busted on Leopard
- From
Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2007, 22:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <9A0785C3-1150-458C-BC84-1E13CC039D28@wincent.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1D7CC3C0-46C1-40D9-AAD5-B9ADFF99B58A@lrde.epita.fr>
El 15/11/2007, a las 22:13, Benoit Sigoure escribió:
Show 40 quoted lines
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > >> El 15/11/2007, a las 17:04, Brian Gernhardt escribió: >> >>> On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: >>> >>>> Was just running the test suite against the master branch and saw >>>> that t9101 is currently failing on Leopard, and a review with git- >>>> bisect indicates that it has been ever since it was first >>>> introduced (in commit 15153451). Not sure if this problem is >>>> Leopard-specific or not as I only have one machine. >>> >>> It is not a Leopard specific problem, as far as I can tell. I >>> just ran the test and had no errors on my Leopard machine. So >>> perhaps it's some other detail of your setup? >>> >>>> I'm not a git-svn user myself, but if there's anything I can do >>>> to help diagnose this problem further on Leopard please let me >>>> know. >>> >>> I just tested it using svn from fink and (after discovering it >>> exists) from Leopard. No problems. Do you have an old svn >>> package (client, admin, or perl binding) installed from Darwin >>> Ports or Fink perhaps? >> >> I don't use Darwin Ports or Fink, and this is a clean Leopard >> install (ie. nothing installed in /usr/local apart from git and a >> very small number of other tools that aren't related to Subversion). >> >> This is the output of "/usr/bin/svn --version": >> >> svn, version 1.4.4 (r25188) >> compiled Sep 23 2007, 22:32:34 >> >> Perhaps then it is something in the environment. > > Hi Wincent, > Can you reproduce this deterministically? If yes, can you re-run > the test with the --verbose flag and post the gzipped output (or > send it to me if the list doesn't like this sort of attachment).
Yes, have just sent you the output of "--verbose" and also running the script using "sh -x" (off list).
Cheers, Wincent