Re: [BUG] t9101 (master) busted on Leopard
- From
Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2007, 21:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1D7CC3C0-46C1-40D9-AAD5-B9ADFF99B58A@lrde.epita.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <041C0054-5E50-483C-9779-B2FE1AE6947C@wincent.com>
On Nov 15, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> El 15/11/2007, a las 17:04, Brian Gernhardt escribió: > >> On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: >> >>> Was just running the test suite against the master branch and saw >>> that t9101 is currently failing on Leopard, and a review with git- >>> bisect indicates that it has been ever since it was first >>> introduced (in commit 15153451). Not sure if this problem is >>> Leopard-specific or not as I only have one machine. >> >> It is not a Leopard specific problem, as far as I can tell. I >> just ran the test and had no errors on my Leopard machine. So >> perhaps it's some other detail of your setup? >> >>> I'm not a git-svn user myself, but if there's anything I can do >>> to help diagnose this problem further on Leopard please let me know. >> >> I just tested it using svn from fink and (after discovering it >> exists) from Leopard. No problems. Do you have an old svn >> package (client, admin, or perl binding) installed from Darwin >> Ports or Fink perhaps? > > I don't use Darwin Ports or Fink, and this is a clean Leopard > install (ie. nothing installed in /usr/local apart from git and a > very small number of other tools that aren't related to Subversion). > > This is the output of "/usr/bin/svn --version": > > svn, version 1.4.4 (r25188) > compiled Sep 23 2007, 22:32:34 > > Perhaps then it is something in the environment.
Hi Wincent, Can you reproduce this deterministically? If yes, can you re-run the test with the --verbose flag and post the gzipped output (or send it to me if the list doesn't like this sort of attachment).
Thanks.
-- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory