Re: [PATCH 11/18] mingw: support renaming symlinks
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 9, 2026, 20:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <99570ae3-d34d-c917-e218-ebbf3f9d7b6c@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <02fa15af-5a57-4557-b016-fd14b9107c6e@kdbg.org>
Hi Hannes,
On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 99 quoted lines
> Am 17.12.25 um 15:08 schrieb Karsten Blees via GitGitGadget:
> > From: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
> >
> > Older MSVCRT's `_wrename()` function cannot rename symlinks over
> > existing files: it returns success without doing anything. Newer
> > MSVCR*.dll versions probably do not share this problem: according to CRT
> > sources, they just call `MoveFileEx()` with the `MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED`
> > flag.
> >
> > Avoid the `_wrename()` call, and go with directly calling
> > `MoveFileEx()`, with proper error handling of course.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > compat/mingw.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c
> > index b1cc30d0f1..55f0bb478e 100644
> > --- a/compat/mingw.c
> > +++ b/compat/mingw.c
> > @@ -2275,7 +2275,7 @@ int mingw_accept(int sockfd1, struct sockaddr *sa, socklen_t *sz)
> > int mingw_rename(const char *pold, const char *pnew)
> > {
> > static int supports_file_rename_info_ex = 1;
> > - DWORD attrs, gle;
> > + DWORD attrs = INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES, gle;
> > int tries = 0;
> > wchar_t wpold[MAX_PATH], wpnew[MAX_PATH];
> > int wpnew_len;
> > @@ -2286,15 +2286,6 @@ int mingw_rename(const char *pold, const char *pnew)
> > if (wpnew_len < 0)
> > return -1;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Try native rename() first to get errno right.
> > - * It is based on MoveFile(), which cannot overwrite existing files.
> > - */
> > - if (!_wrename(wpold, wpnew))
> > - return 0;
> > - if (errno != EEXIST)
> > - return -1;
> > -
> > repeat:
> > if (supports_file_rename_info_ex) {
> > /*
> > @@ -2370,13 +2361,22 @@ repeat:
> > * to retry.
> > */
> > } else {
> > - if (MoveFileExW(wpold, wpnew, MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING))
> > + if (MoveFileExW(wpold, wpnew,
> > + MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING | MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED))
> > return 0;
> > gle = GetLastError();
> > }
> >
> > - /* TODO: translate more errors */
> > - if (gle == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED &&
> > + /* revert file attributes on failure */
> > + if (attrs != INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES)
> > + SetFileAttributesW(wpnew, attrs);
> > +
> > + if (!is_file_in_use_error(gle)) {
> > + errno = err_win_to_posix(gle);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (attrs == INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES &&
> > (attrs = GetFileAttributesW(wpnew)) != INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES) {
> > if (attrs & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY) {
> > DWORD attrsold = GetFileAttributesW(wpold);
> > @@ -2388,16 +2388,10 @@ repeat:
> > return -1;
> > }
> > if ((attrs & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY) &&
> > - SetFileAttributesW(wpnew, attrs & ~FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY)) {
> > - if (MoveFileExW(wpold, wpnew, MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING))
> > - return 0;
> > - gle = GetLastError();
> > - /* revert file attributes on failure */
> > - SetFileAttributesW(wpnew, attrs);
> > - }
> > + SetFileAttributesW(wpnew, attrs & ~FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY))
> > + goto repeat;
> > }
> > - if (gle == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED &&
> > - retry_ask_yes_no(&tries, "Rename from '%s' to '%s' failed. "
> > + if (retry_ask_yes_no(&tries, "Rename from '%s' to '%s' failed. "
> > "Should I try again?", pold, pnew))
> > goto repeat;
> >
>
> The logic in this function is incredibly convoluted. It does look
> somewhat reasonable, at least on the non-error path, but whether the
> variable attr is changed and reset as needed after 'goto repeat' and the
> various failure modes, I cannot tell. I give up and trust that this code
> has been battle-tested during the past decade and works as desired.I do agree that the logic is quite convoluted. Historically grown, like. But as you suspect: This has been battle-hardened, and I am loathe to introduce a regression by making it prettier at this point. This is tried and tested code, and that counts for something.
Ciao, Johannes