Re: [PATCH v2] git{,-blame}.el: remove old bitrotting Emacs code
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2018, 18:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87woyfq02x.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqbmfr3jke.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Junio C. Hamano jotted:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> writes: > >>> +Emacs's own support for Git got better than what was offered by these >>> +modules, or was superseded by popular 3rd-party Git modes such as >>> +Magit. >> >> This somehow reads like "Emacs's own support ... was superseded ...". >> Maybe that's what you mean, but i'm not sure. Perhaps s/, was superseded >> by/. There are also/. > > I think "There are also" is way better. If we really want to sy > superseded, perhaps "The features these modules offered were > superseded by Emacs's own support in VC mode, and popular > third-party Git modes e.g. Magit" is what we can say.
I sent a v3 a few days ago which addressed this, it's at 20180310184545.16950-1-avarab@gmail.com (https://public-inbox.org/git/20180310184545.16950-1-avarab@gmail.com/) but I see that I screwd up the In-Reply-To (I still don't have this fully automated) so that wasn't part of this thread, sorry.
That changes this wording, among other fixes (noted in the tbdiff).