Re: [PATCH 00/22] Refactor to accept NUL in commit messages
- From
Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2011, 10:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87sjmh4brz.fsf@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111024224558.GB10481@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:45:58 +0200 Jeff King wrote:
> [1] English is my first language, so it's rare for me to even step > outside of ASCII, let alone latin1. But aren't there some languages in > which utf-16 is more efficient than utf-8?
You sometimes hear something along the lines of the second "disadvantage" listed in the article below, i.e. "Characters U+0800 through U+FFFF use three bytes in UTF-8, but only two in UTF-16.":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8#Disadvantages_4
-- Štěpán