Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
- From
Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2010, 08:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87iq8a8dj8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100402081052.GW3533@machine.or.cz>
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > > We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only > > > > license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version" > > > > clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with > > > > GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh. > > > > > > Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some > > > kind of stale e-mail message? > > > > The month ago, I didn't contact *ALL* contributors, but only the ones > > with significat contribution. Now I want to finish relicensing by > > contacting all contributors as sugested in some responses. > > Then perhaps you should exclude those who already replied earlier? > It seems to me the list on the wiki is quite similar in magnitude to > the recipient list of the last mail, surely there's no need to bother > everyone again just for few extra people?
That's exactly what I did. I excluded those who stated explicitely that they agree. Shall I take your response as an agreement?
Michal