Re: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
- From
- Junio C Hamano <gitster-e+axbwqsrlaavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org>
- Date
- Feb 23, 2010, 03:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vljekipnd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87y6ilf4w7.fsf-dGZf2j/AgvDc+SJF09bjuWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Carl Worth <cworth-4HiWtcSh4w0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> writes:
> From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Carl Worth <cworth-4HiWtcSh4w0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
Please drop the above the next time.
Show 6 quoted lines
> The relicensing was agreed to by Junio C Hamano here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/1389/focus=140156 > > and in follow-up messages by Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes Schindelin, > Pierre Habouzit, and Johannes Sixt.
FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
You are the party that wants this relicensing, not me. Please do not burden me with excessive legwork for you, but help me a bit more proactively to make this happen.
> Meanwhile, a message ID lives forever and can be used in multiple > contexts.
Oh, I never said "do not use message ID". I said "message ID alone is not good enough for most people". Users of gmane and notmuch who know the tool they use would benefit from having message ID, _too_, but even if you were a user of notmuch, unless you have subscribed to the list and have your own archive, you wouldn't be able to say "show id:frotz".