Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?
- From
- Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2010, 17:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87aavsu9b3.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpr4o3lg9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Steve Diver <squelch2@googlemail.com> writes:
[...]
> If read carefully (some may argue that it does not need a very careful > reading to get it, though), this hints that "detached HEAD" state is a > substitute for using a temporary branch, but it may not be strong > enough.
For my rather fresh eye it looks more like unnamed (anonymous?) branch than a temporary one. Doesn't detached HEAD behave exactly like a regular HEAD but pointing to the tip of an unnamed branch?
-- Sergei.