Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 2, 2010, 00:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vaavso537.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <ron1-ABA66E.15563101022010@news.gmane.org>
Ron Garret <ron1@flownet.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> This shows that you are still thinking a branch is a line (or multiple >> lines). It is not. > > The git user's guide says it is: > > "When we need to be precise, we will use the word "branch" to mean a > line of development..."
I think the last paragraph "to put it in another way" in my other message to you will clear this confusion.