Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2010, 23:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwrywplxz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <ron1-6F8B85.14520801022010@news.gmane.org>
Ron Garret <ron1@flownet.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> For my rather fresh eye it looks more like unnamed (anonymous?) branch >> than a temporary one. Doesn't detached HEAD behave exactly like a >> regular HEAD but pointing to the tip of an unnamed branch? > > I strongly concur with this. > > And as long as I'm weighing in, it would also help to prevent confusion > if it were made clear that this unnamed branch doesn't actually come > into existence unless and until you do a commit.
This shows that you are still thinking a branch is a line (or multiple lines). It is not.