Re: [PATCH de.po 5/5] de.po: collection of suggestions

> As one of the earlier translators: I agree with most of those as well. Thanks 
> a lot. However, one small remark:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012, 15:49:27 schrieb Thomas Rast:
>> @@ -676,11 +675,11 @@ msgstr "hinter "
>> 
>>  #: wt-status.c:908 wt-status.c:911
>>  msgid "ahead "
>> -msgstr "über "
>> +msgstr "weiter: "
>> 
>>  #: wt-status.c:913
>>  msgid ", behind "
>> -msgstr ", hinter "
>> +msgstr ", zurückgefallen "
>> 
>>  #: builtin/add.c:62
>>  #, c-format
>> @@ -903,12 +902,12 @@ msgstr "Zweig '%s' zeigt auf keine Version"
>>  #: builtin/branch.c:396
>>  #, c-format
>>  msgid "behind %d] "
>> -msgstr "hinter %d] "
>> +msgstr "%d hinterher] "
>> 
>>  #: builtin/branch.c:398
>>  #, c-format
>>  msgid "ahead %d] "
>> -msgstr "vor %d] "
>> +msgstr "%d voraus] "
>
> In the above hunk, you said "ahead = weiter" and "behind = zurückgefallen", 
> but now you say "ahead = voraus" and "behind = hinterher". Is it helpful to 
> use two different translations, or shouldn't those rather be chosen 
> identically? The second set sounds somewhat better to me, but the more 
> important question is whether both hunks should use the same translations.