Re: [PATCH v3] diff.c: keep arrow(=>) on show_stats()'s shortened filename part to make rename visible.
- From
Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
- Date
- Oct 13, 2013, 20:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <877gdg7w46.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <660A536D-9993-4B81-B6FF-A113F9111570@gmail.com>
Hi,
Yoshioka Tsuneo <yoshiokatsuneo@gmail.com> writes:
> "git diff -M --stat" can detect rename and show renamed file name like > "foofoofoo => barbarbar", but if destination filename is long the line > is shortened like "...barbarbar" so there is no way to know whether the > file is renamed or existed in the source commit.
Thanks for your patch! I think this is indeed something that should be fixed.
Can you explain the algorithm chosen in the commit message or a block comment in the code? I find it much easier to follow large code blocks (like the one you added) with a prior notion of what it tries to do.
[As an aside, Documentation/SubmittingPatches says
The body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:
. explains the problem the change tries to solve, iow, what is wrong
with the current code without the change. . justifies the way the change solves the problem, iow, why the
result with the change is better.. alternate solutions considered but discarded, if any.
Observe that you explained the first item very well, but not the others.]
> This commit makes it visible like "...foo => ...bar".
Also, you should rewrite this to be in the imperative mood:
Make sure there is always an arrow, e.g., "...foo => ...bar".
or some such.
[Again from SubmittingPatches:
Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
its behaviour.]> Signed-off-by: Tsuneo Yoshioka <yoshiokatsuneo@gmail.com> > --- > diff.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Can you add a test? Perhaps like the one below. (You can squash it into your commit if you like it.)
Note that in the test, the generated line looks like this:
{..._does_not_fit_in_a_single_line => .../path1 | 0I don't want to go all bikesheddey, but I think it's somewhat unfortunate that the elided parts do not correspond to each other. In particular, I think the closing brace should not be omitted. Perhaps something like this would be ideal (making it up on the spot, don't count characters):
{...a_single_line => ..._as_the_first}/path1 | 0diff --git a/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh b/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh index 2f327b7..03d6371 100755 --- a/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh +++ b/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh @@ -156,4 +156,16 @@ test_expect_success 'rename pretty print common prefix and suffix overlap' ' test_i18ngrep " d/f/{ => f}/e " output ' +test_expect_success 'rename of very long path shows =>' ' + mkdir long_dirname_that_does_not_fit_in_a_single_line && + mkdir another_extremely_long_path_but_not_the_same_as_the_first && + cp path1 long_dirname*/ && + git add long_dirname*/path1 && + test_commit add_long_pathname && + git mv long_dirname*/path1 another_extremely_*/ && + test_commit move_long_pathname && + git diff -M --stat HEAD^ HEAD >output && + test_i18ngrep "=>.*path1" output +' + test_done
-- Thomas Rast tr@thomasrast.ch