Re: [PATCH 2/3] MyFirstContribution: also explain cover letter in GitGitGadget section
- From
Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2022, 23:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <875578c1-c3a9-bccb-40a7-b390b6a123ef@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <f7f64135-7d57-5926-501b-13e83411b4fd@github.com>
Hi Victoria,
Le 2022-04-29 à 12:27, Victoria Dye a écrit :
Show 117 quoted lines
> Philippe Blain wrote:
>> Hi Victoria,
>>
>> Le 2022-04-27 à 16:43, Victoria Dye a écrit :
>>> Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>
>>>> +----
>>>> +Adding the 'psuh' command
>>>
>>> Typically I see patch series titles follow the same "imperative mood" as
>>> commit titles/messages (see 'Documentation/SubmittingPatches.txt'). I'm not
>>> sure whether that's a rule written down somewhere or just convention, but
>>> for the sake of consistency you might want to do something like:
>>>
>>> "Add the 'psuh' command"
>>>
>>
>> I fully agree. I just copied the existing patch series title from
>> the git-send-email section further down. I think it would make sense
>> to change this to also using the imperative mood just like commit messages
>> in a preparatory commit. I'll do that.
>>
>>>> +----
>>>> +
>>>> +Your PR's description will used as the body of the cover letter.
>>>
>>> Including the line "Your PR's description..." is somewhat confusing to me as
>>> a first-time reader, since I was interpreting this section to be the
>>> *verbatim* text of the pull request title & description. If this *is* meant
>>> to be that description, then the note about the PR description can be
>>> removed. That point is also mentioned above, so it's probably not needed
>>> here anyway.
>>
>> I'm not exactly sure what you mean. I meant that the description of the PR
>> will be used as the body of the cover letter...
>>
>
> Sorry for being unclear. What I meant was that, the way this part of the
> document reads (to me) right now, it looks like the recommendation is to
> create a pull request with the title & description:
>
> Title:
> Adding the 'psuh' command
> Description:
> Your PR's description will [be] used as the body of the cover
> letter. <insert content from MyFirstContribution-coverletter.txt>
>
> That is, the line "Your PR description will..." is the first line of the
> description (which I don't think was your intention).
>
> That said, upon a more holistic re-read, I've found a few more things that
> are confusing/oddly phrased. I'll try re-reviewing (part of) the patch
> below, with (hopefully) more direct/concrete feedback this time:
>
>> -Review the PR's title and description, as it's used by GitGitGadget as the cover
>> -letter for your change. When you're happy, submit your pull request.
>> +Review the PR's title and description, as they're used by GitGitGadget as the
>> +cover letter for your change. The cover letter describes your proposed
>> +contribution as a whole and is ideal to mention any context that might be
>
> s/is ideal to/should(?)
>
>> +useful for reviewers. The title of your PR should be something which
>> +succinctly covers the purpose of your entire topic branch, for example:
>> +
>> +----
>> +Adding the 'psuh' command
>> +----
>
> Other than the "Adding" -> "Add" change, this is good - the example title
> will be formatted as a monospaced block, clearly separating it from the
> advice/context preceding it.
>
>> +
>> +Your PR's description will used as the body of the cover letter.
>> +include::MyFirstContribution-coverletter.txt[]
>> +
>
> Conversely, this section has no visible separation between the context
> ("Your PR's description...") and the example
> ("include::MyFirstContribution-coverletter.txt[]"), hence my confusion
> earlier.
>
> To parallel the title example, maybe you could use similar monospace
> formatting for the example? E.g.:
>
> +
> +Your PR's description will used as the body of the cover letter.
> +
> +----
> +include::MyFirstContribution-coverletter.txt[]
> +----
> +
>
> One thing I noticed on my re-read is that the context you provide for the
> title ("The title of your PR should be something...") isn't quite paralleled
> in the context for the description ("Your PR's description..."). The former
> talks about *how* you should write your cover letter title, whereas the
> latter simply states that the PR description will become the cover letter's
> content. For added context, then, you might want to describe how the cover
> letter content should be written, e.g.:
>
> +
> +Your PR's description will be used as the body of the cover letter and
> +should explain the purpose of the series, for example:
> +
> +----
> +include::MyFirstContribution-coverletter.txt[]
> +----
> +
>
> (note the s/will used/will be used)
>
> Apologies for all the picky grammar comments - this series includes a lot of
> really helpful information for new contributors, and I really appreciate
> your work here! Hopefully my feedback is a bit more clear this time (and is
> relatively straightforward to implement).Thanks for your feedback. I'll send an updated and expanded version soon and I think I've adressed the different things you noted.
Cheers,
Philippe.