Re: [PATCH 1/2] apply, entry: speak of submodules instead of subprojects
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Jul 16, 2013, 20:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8738res1yc.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <51E5997E.2090607@web.de>
Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> writes:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Am 16.07.2013 20:07, schrieb Jonathan Nieder: >> Thomas Rast wrote: >> >>> There are only four (with some generous rounding) instances in the >>> current source code where we speak of "subproject" instead of >>> "submodule". They are as follows: >> [...] >>> Let's at least change the error messages to consistently call them >>> "submodule". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> >>> --- >>> This and the next one are message changes for things I found during my >>> review. >> >> Thanks. It's nice when translation results in the messages in English >> being improved, too. > > Obviously I like this change too. ;-) > > But a 'git grep "corrupt patch for sub"' shows some files in the po > directory still containing that string on current master. Shouldn't > they be changed too or is this just a sign of me not understanding > the translation process?
I haven't checked any guides, but I imagine that the resulting manual translation update is what prompts the translators to also check if they need to adapt the message.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch