Re: Git benchmark - comparison with Bazaar, Darcs, Git and Mercurial

From

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>

Date

Aug 2, 2007, 10:29 UTC

Message-ID

<86tzrikz5x.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>

In-Reply-To

<7vejim1n92.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

>  * With -l, as long as the source repository is healthy, it is
>    very likely that the recipient would be, too.  Also it is
>    very cheap.  You do not get any back-up benefit.

> Which leads me to believe that being able to use file:/// is
> probably a good idea, if only for testability, but probably of
> little practical value, and we can default to -l for everyday
> use, and paranoids can use non -l as a way to make a back-up.

Sane enough, I guess.

-- 
David Kastrup