Re: Git benchmark - comparison with Bazaar, Darcs, Git and Mercurial

From: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Date: Aug 1, 2007, 22:49 UTC
Message-ID: <46B10DE2.5060702@nrlssc.navy.mil>
In-Reply-To: <20070801220350.GD28106@thunk.org>

Theodore Tso wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:15:25AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

>> Perhaps if the destination is local,
>>
>>          - if -s is given, just set up alternates, do nothing else;
> 
> As I understand it, the main objection with making -s the default is
> surprising result that could happen if you do a git-prune in the base
> repository which causes objects which are borrowed from the base
> repository via .git/objects/info/alternates, right?

-s would be a lot safer to use if repack -a -d (as used by git-gc) was smarter. -a -d has the nasty side effect of doing what it seems only prune is intended to do... that is to remove unreferenced objects.

-s usage currently has to be very well thought out, unless you're just using it for a short-lived temporary branch. If this unintended pruning could be avoided then an average user could go about their merry business repacking and git-gc'ing without a care, and only when doing a git-gc --prune would they need to do something special.

-brandon