Re: Git benchmark - comparison with Bazaar, Darcs, Git and Mercurial
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 1, 2007, 05:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vodhrby6f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707311850220.4161@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> (Which admittedly is a bit odd. The reason I didn't ever seriously even > consider monotone was that the initial import was so *incredibly* sucky, > and took hours for the kernel. So use "-l" for benchmarks, and damn my > "I hate hardlinking repos" idiocy).
I would call aversion to -l a superstition, while aversion to -s has a sound technical reasons. The latter means you need to know what you are doing --- namely, you are making the clone still dependent on the original.