Re: [BUG] "git pull" will regress between 'master' and 'pu'

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
>> This is primarily note-to-self; even though I haven't got around
>> bisecting yet, I think I know I did some bad change myself.
>>
>> "git pull $URL $tag" seems to:
>>
>>  * fail to invoke the editor without "--edit".
>>  * show the summary merge log message twice.
> 
> We seem to be making a good progress on the discussion on this
> specific issue, but a larger tangent of this is that we do not seem
> to have test coverage to catch this regression.  As we are planning
> to rewrite "git pull", we need to make sure we have enough test
> coverage to ensure that nothing will regress before doing so.