Re: [PATCH] DT_UNKNOWN: do not fully trust existence of DT_UNKNOWN
On 1/21/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> +#undef DT_UNKNOWN
> >> +#undef DT_DIR
> >> +#undef DT_REG
> >> +#undef DT_LNK
> >
> > yes, of course
>
> That is technically correct but I suspect it would not matter in
> practice. The only thing you are avoiding is four compiler
> warnings when compiling for Cygwin of this week (I heard this is
> already fixed in Cygwin CVS). On older Cygwin you simply would
> not use NO_D_TYPE_IN_DIRENT, since d_type worked before. No?