Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2008, 04:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy75n3zus.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806021845210.3473@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> Actually, it's trivial to convert to other SCM's, although I guess the > conversion tools haven't really tried. You can always turn it into a > series of multiple merges. Yes, you lose information, but it's not like > you lose a huge amount.
One thing to worry about is what tree object you would give to each of these "artificially split" merge commits, though.