Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2008, 07:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vskvv2bux.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200806030932.03051.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> [*1*] I assume that this kind of merge is called 'octopus' because it > has more than two "legs" (parents), and not for example because > first such merge had 8 parents?
The first one ever was actually a pentapus, 211232b (Octopus merge of the following five patches., 2005-05-05).
"gitk 211232b" was a beautiful sight back then, and it still is. The history was much simpler back then.