Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?)
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2008, 20:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200806032227.02951.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806031244290.3473@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> One of the things I could imagine using git for is to have "annotation > branches" for things like code review etc. They'd be a real branch in > their own right and with their own history, but at the same time they > could well want to point back to the "code branch" that they annotate by > considering that another parent in a "non-data merge" (and yes, you'd > obviously have to use a special merge strategy for things like that, but > you'd likely integrate it in some "annotation tool chain" rather than > anything else).
By the way, what is status of git-notes / commit annotations? Did it got abandoned, on hiatus, or what?
-- Jakub Narebski Poland