Re: [PATCH] Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 11, 2009, 00:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwsbxizlg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200902110127.18149.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> onsdag 11 februari 2009 00:56:49 skrev Junio C Hamano: >> We failed to honor what the end user wanted: to repack. Why should we >> exit 0 here? > > A repack may or may not yield a better packed repo. In this case, not, > but for a different reason than failing to find better deltas. Given the > circumstances that is most likely to cause the "failure (repacking on > windows), this is "normal" behaviour and no reason to scare the user > with an error code.
Up to this point, I felt my earlier misconception corrected, but then ...
> The unlink error might be enough.
... I think we should not even show unlink errors, if "this is not an error, nothing to worry about" is the official stance about such failure; otherwise the errors will scare people, *and* others then doubly complain that even the command detects errors, the whole thing does *not* error out.