Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 05/16] t2104: Don't fail for index versions other than [23]
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 6, 2012, 01:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwr1c243x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1344203353-2819-6-git-send-email-t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> writes:
Show 26 quoted lines
> t2104 currently checks for the exact index version 2 or 3, > depending if there is a skip-worktree flag or not. Other > index versions do not use extended flags and thus cannot > be tested for version changes. > > Make this test update the index to version 2 at the beginning > of the test. Testing the skip-worktree flags for the default > index format is still covered by t7011 and t7012. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> > --- > t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh b/t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh > index 1d0879b..4ef7d99 100755 > --- a/t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh > +++ b/t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh > @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' > mkdir sub && > touch ./1 ./2 sub/1 sub/2 && > git add 1 2 sub/1 sub/2 && > - git ls-files -t | test_cmp expect.full - > + git ls-files -t | test_cmp expect.full - && > + git update-index --index-version=2 > '
Makes sense, but wouldn't it make even more sense to do this at the very beginning? i.e.
git update-index --index-version 2 &&
mkdir sub &&
touch 1 2 sub/1 sub/2 &&
git add 1 2 sub/1 sub/2 &&
git ls-files -t | test_cmp expect.full -