Re: [PATCH 3/6] ll-merge: let caller decide whether to renormalize
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 4, 2010, 18:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vvd7qfdsa.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100804032144.GD19699@burratino>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Add a "renormalize" parameter to ll_merge so callers can decide on a > case-by-case basis whether the merge is likely to have overlapped with > a change in smudge/clean rules. This reveals a few commands that have > not been taking that situation into account, though it does not fix > them. > > No change in behavior intended.
Looking nice so far; I however think a separate "renormalize" parameter should be folded into "flag" word, perhaps with a few new macros to make it easier to access renormalize, virtual-ancestor, and favor-side parts it.