Re: [PATCH] Allow hand-editing of patches before sending
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2006, 11:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vslh0bwsm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061103105349.GA18651@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> One thing is certain, though: When I sent 8bit-encoded patches from > StGIT to this list, the vger mail server added headers saying that it > didn't like 8bit, and had re-encoded the mail (to what, I don't recall > just now). It warned that in doing so, it had to make assumptions > about the charset used. The assumption it had made was that the text > was latin1, which is not so good when it is in fact utf8. > > This all just strengthens my belief that StGIT should go to great > legths to avoid stepping on mail servers' toes.
I wonder if this can be solved by simply reusing the machinery format-patch already has. If calling it as a standalone script does more unnecessary things than what StGIT wants, we should certainly be able to separate the only necessary part out to suit StGIT's needs.