Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] gitweb: refactor If-Modified-Since handling
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 26, 2012, 18:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vsjgvnr4x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120326173646.GA6524@odin.tremily.us>
"W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:12:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... > Only passing in the epoch. We could reduce computation at the expense > of complication by passing in both the epoch and a formatted time > string, but after Jakub's suggestions, I felt like a simpler interface > was the better approach. I don't feel particularly committed to > either way, so just tell me which you'd like best ;).
The existing codepath already had the call to parse_date() nearby and that was the only reason I made the suggestion. The caller in the snapshot codepath would need to call parse_date() much earlier and it would have to be conditional to the availability of %co, so the simpler interface would probably be overall win.
>> Missing " &&" at the end (same in 3/3). > > Oops. I wonder why my tests still passed :p. Will fix in v5.
The test will pass if there is no breakage. The offence of missing " &&" after your "grep 200" is that it will let the test pass even if you did not have "200" in the output, failing to catch future breakage.