Re: [PATCH 0/3] fixup remaining cvsimport tests
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 20, 2013, 18:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vsj5vlm1d.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130120152857.GM31172@serenity.lan>
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote: >>>> These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15 >>>> tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent >>>> to Eric (fixes revision map.) >>> >>> Did you post the fix for the revision map publicly anywhere? >> >> It's in Eric's repo and included in version 3.8: >> >> https://gitorious.org/cvsps/cvsps/commit/abe81e1775a8959291f629029513d1b7160bbde6 > > Thanks. For some reason I thought the fix would be to > git-cvsimport-3.py. Obviously I should have read more carefully. > > Sorry for the noise.
This is not a noise, though.
Chris, how would we want to proceed? I'd prefer at some point to see cvsimport-3 to be in sync when the one patched and tested in Eric's repository is proven enough. Will Eric be the gatekeeper, or will you be sending patches this way as well?