Re: [RFC] Should "log --cc" imply "log --cc -p"?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2013, 15:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vsj5avk43.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130205093307.GC24973@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> git log --cc --stat > > the "--cc" is significant. So I don't think it is right for "--cc" to > always imply "-p". But if the rule kicked in only when no other format > had been specified, that might make sense.
Yes, it was my mistake that I left it unsaid. Obviously the description of the "minor irritation" must be qualified with "unless no other output options like --raw, --stat, etc. are given".
Thanks.