From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:46:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should "log --cc" imply "log --cc -p"?
Message-ID: <7vsj5avk43.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130205093307.GC24973@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

>   git log --cc --stat
>
> the "--cc" is significant. So I don't think it is right for "--cc" to
> always imply "-p". But if the rule kicked in only when no other format
> had been specified, that might make sense.

Yes, it was my mistake that I left it unsaid.  Obviously the
description of the "minor irritation" must be qualified with "unless
no other output options like --raw, --stat, etc. are given".

Thanks.