Re: Malformed branch name in fast-export when specifying non-HEAD/branch revision
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2011, 21:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vpqjxuogr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110822175705.GB1945@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Yeah, the behavior of your patch looks fine to me. I thought the point > in contention was that having export understand refspecs would fix a lot > of _other_ cases, too.
Perhaps if we added refspecs we could cover other cases, too, but I do not think we need to require the patch to cover additional cases. The more problematic was that the particular implementation in the patch smelled bad.