Re: Malformed branch name in fast-export when specifying non-HEAD/branch revision
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2011, 21:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110822213214.GA14404@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpqjxuogr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:27:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > Yeah, the behavior of your patch looks fine to me. I thought the point > > in contention was that having export understand refspecs would fix a lot > > of _other_ cases, too. > > Perhaps if we added refspecs we could cover other cases, too, but I do not > think we need to require the patch to cover additional cases. The more > problematic was that the particular implementation in the patch smelled > bad.
OK. I didn't look at that at all. I just wanted to express my support for "refspecs would solve other problems, too". :)
-Peff