From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:27:00 GMT Subject: Re: Malformed branch name in fast-export when specifying non-HEAD/branch revision Message-ID: <7vpqjxuogr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110822175705.GB1945@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Yeah, the behavior of your patch looks fine to me. I thought the point > in contention was that having export understand refspecs would fix a lot > of _other_ cases, too. Perhaps if we added refspecs we could cover other cases, too, but I do not think we need to require the patch to cover additional cases. The more problematic was that the particular implementation in the patch smelled bad.