Re: Git.pm
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 11, 2012, 18:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobpulhbk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <86likyy7ub.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
>>>>>> "Subho" == Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com> writes: > > Subho> I have started looking into how the error catching mechanism > Subho> implemented right now. I have looked into the more modern error > Subho> catching/throwing mechanisms in use in perl, and I am of the opinion > Subho> that Try::Simple would probably be the best candidate for being the > Subho> new error catching mechanism. I also wanted to discuss some aspects of > Subho> the changes to be made - > > Try::Tiny is preferred to Try::Simple.
Thanks for an expert input; could you give another comparison between Try::Tiny vs the use of bare "eval / if ($@)"?