Re: Git.pm
- From
Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2012, 19:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4F99A91F.3050307@vilain.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAB3zAY3-Bn86bCr7Rxqi4vxbYFxUesLwm8gddxyMSexov2tOhw@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/25/12 9:15 PM, Subho Banerjee wrote:
> ---> I see in the code that it says that the API is experimental. Is > there any absolute need for backward compatibility, or can I try to > redesign the API somewhat extensively?
If you stick to putting new APIs under different namespaces, or new functions, then you should be able to preserve API compatibility. I think Git.pm is now too widely used for breaking compatibility to be an option.
I think I submitted a Git::Config to this list some time ago; did you find that?
Sam