From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:10:23 GMT
Subject: Re: Git.pm
Message-ID: <7vobpulhbk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <86likyy7ub.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>

merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:

>>>>>> "Subho" == Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Subho> I have started looking into how the error catching mechanism
> Subho> implemented right now. I have looked into the more modern error
> Subho> catching/throwing mechanisms in use in perl, and I am of the opinion
> Subho> that Try::Simple would probably be the best candidate for being the
> Subho> new error catching mechanism. I also wanted to discuss some aspects of
> Subho> the changes to be made -
>
> Try::Tiny is preferred to Try::Simple.

Thanks for an expert input; could you give another comparison between
Try::Tiny vs the use of bare "eval / if ($@)"?