Re: [PATCH] Allow update hooks to update refs on their own
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2007, 19:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmysy5h5k.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071128161033.GA20308@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> Couldn't you do this with a status message? ("ok <refname> changed by
>> hook" or something.)
>
> Having just touched this code, I believe the answer is yes. receive-pack
> has always sent just "ok <refname>\n", so we could start interpreting
> anything after the <refname> bit freely...More importantly, no send-pack choked on "ok <refname>" followed by a SP (old ones just checked "ok" and nothing else, the current one NULs out the SP and lets you use the rest as a message), so such a change to receive-pack does not have to break older send-pack.