Show 7 quoted lines
> So I wanted to develop a really nice, easy to follow book for Git
> newcomers to learn git quickly and easily. One of the issues I
> remember having when learning Git is that there is a lot of great
> material in the User Guide, Tutorial, Tutorial 2, Everyday Git, etc -
> but they're all huge long documents that are sometimes difficult to
> come back to and remember where you were, and I didn't know which one
> to start with or where to find what I was looking for, etc.
Interesting. A few comments, before I get dragged into my day job fully.
[overall]
- Some people mentioned that the necessity of reading through large
volume of documentation can be reduced if they were divided by
developer roles (similar to how Everyday does), e.g. people in
individual contributor role does not have to learn integrator tools
such as "am" in their first pass on the documentation. Has the
approach considered while developing this book?
- The order of sections in "Working with Git" chapter somehow does not
feel quite right, except that I'd agree that "Git on Windows" at the
beginning is a very good idea (disclaimer. I do not use Windows
myself). "StGIT" coming next was very understandable, but then
"Capistrano"???? And no CVS section next to Subversion section? Ruby
before Perl or Python (I would have listed Perl, Python and then Ruby
to avoid language wars. That's the language age order, and it is even
alphabetical)???
Above "Capistrano" and "Ruby" comment shows the bias this TOC has (and
my bias being different from the TOC's bias). I'd imagine that
Ruby-minded folks won't share the same reaction as I had. What's the
target audience of this book? Git users in general, or primarily
Ruby-minded subset? If the latter, labeling this as "Community Book"
may be misleading.
[http://book.git-scm.com/1_the_git_object_database.html]
- The color of "blob" does not match the blob that is committed to eat
trees at the top of your site ;-)
- In a recent thread on the list, quite a lot of people seem to have
found that teaching the low level details and plumbing first to the new
people is detrimental. Do you have response to that thread?