Re: markdown 2 man, was Re: Git Community Book
Hi,
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Please ignore if this is not appropriate.
Well, so I should've ignored, but I think this is worth some correction.
> Asciidoc or Markdown are tools that accommodate the _developer_, not the
> user. I understand that these markup language are ideally suited for in
> source documentation (thought I personally much prefer Doxygen).
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/ says
``AsciiDoc is a text document format for writing short documents,
articles, books and UNIX man pages. AsciiDoc files can be translated to
HTML and DocBook markups using the asciidoc(1) command.''
http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ says
``Markdown is a text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers. Markdown
allows you to write using an easy-to-read, easy-to-write plain text
format, then convert it to structurally valid XHTML (or HTML).''
So those are not suited for in-source documentation.
They're "lightweight" markup for documentation, very easy to read and somehow
easy to write for non-developers.
The user manual can give you an impression:
http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=blob;f=Documentation/user-manual.txt
I think, this is easier than LyX for users and developers..
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F